Although everyone has heard of the catchy phrase, I think very few people know what the "new world order" stands for. Depending on who you talk to, definitions range from type of government structure to economic policy to leadership role in international affairs. It seems to me that the new world order has never been defined in concrete terms. Therefore, it has become a catch all expression which encompasses many different ideas. I think the …showed first 75 words of 1088 total…

…showed last 75 words of 1088 total…spread again. Since we can't predict the future, I don't think it is wise to place such a limiting definition on world organizations. I think the mission statement of NATO should also be altered so that the organization's purpose is to defend against ALL unwanted advances of any kind towards ANY nation. With broader mission statements these organizations can adapt to rapidly changing world events without always having to reassess their current position. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ **Bibliography**