Brazil's transformation from an authoritarian regime to a presidential democracy was a slow and faltered attempt. From the early suggestions of democratic development, there were both administrations that contributed to democratic growth, as well as administrations that opposed this liberalization. This led to an instability in the Brazilian form of democratic government, their economy, and their political parties. The people's reactions to these instabilities confirm the fact that the Brazilian democratic regime was not working …showed first 75 words of 3291 total…

…showed last 75 words of 3291 total…id not represent a true continual dual legitimacy between the executive and legislature. Perhaps most importantly was the fact that the people did not actually choose the president. Since the government's main concern seemed to be retaining their party1s power, they kept the people from making a real difference in choosing the president. These circumstances collectively confirm the fact that the Brazilian government was far from a true democratic presidential regime.