Unanimous Verdict vs. Majority Rules Verdicts

Title: Unanimous Verdict vs. Majority Rules Verdicts
Category: /Society & Culture/Education
Details: Words: 898 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Unanimous Verdict vs. Majority Rules Verdicts
The use of a jury is the traditional method within the common law for deciding the facts in any dispute between parties. The role of a jury is to determine question of fact. The jury is in a powerful method because ultimately, it determines whether a person is guilty or innocent. In civil cases, the main function of the jury is to find the facts having regard to the evidence, and assess damages. The number …showed first 75 words of 898 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 898 total…to the often-increased length of time that juries must deliberate to achieve a unanimous verdict. Whilst adopting the unanimous verdict trial system, may, at times allow the guilty to escape conviction, it also acts to minimise the risk of convicting the innocent. In summation it can be stated that there is no immediate, or urgent need to change the existing rule requiring unanimity to a system by which those in the minority can be ignored.

Need a custom written paper?
Buy a custom written essay and get 20% OFF the first order